-
Коммюнике
More
-
Корреспонденция
More
-
Перечень рекомендаций
More
-
Принципы и руководящие положения
More
2013-07-18-Community Applications
Рекомендации GAC
2013-07-18-Community Applications
N/A
Консенсус достигнут
2013-07-18-Community Applications
Communication
b. Community Applications
i. The GAC reiterates its advice from the Beijing Communiqué regarding preferential treatment for all applications which have demonstrable community support, while noting community concerns over the high costs for pursuing a Community Objection process as well as over the high threshold for passing Community Priority Evaluation.
ii. Therefore the GAC advises the ICANN Board to:
-
- Consider to take better account of community views, and improve outcomes for communities, within the existing framework, independent of whether those communities have utilized ICANN’s formal community processes to date.
Acknowledgement of Register Entry
Acknowledgement of Durban GAC Communique.pdf
Current Status/Communications Log
resolutions-new-gtld-annex-1-10sep13-en.pdf
Board Action (Accept/Disagree)
The NGPC accepts the reiteration of the GAC’s earlier advice from the Beijing Communiqué. The NGPC accepted this advice<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-new-gtld-04jun13-en.htm#1.a> and stated as follows: Criterion 4 for the Community Priority Evaluation process takes into account 'community support and/or opposition to the application' in determining whether to award priority to a community application in a contention set. (Note however that if a contention set is not resolved by the applicants or through a community priority evaluation then ICANN will utilize an auction as the objective method for resolving the contention.)
The NGPC accepts this advice. The NGPC will consider taking better account of community views and improving outcomes for communities, within the existing framework, independent of whether those communities have utilized ICANN’s formal community processes to date. The NGPC notes that in general it may not be possible to improve any outcomes for communities beyond what may result from the utilization of the AGB’s community processes while at the same time remaining within the existing framework.